Wrested Scriptures

Alleged Contradictions and Inaccuracies

Inspiration
Partial
Contradictions
& Inaccuracies

  Preliminary
  Exodus 6:3
  Exodus 33:11,20
  1 Samuel 15:35
  1 Kings 15:14
  2 Kings 18:5
  2 Kings 24:6
  Matthew 2:1
  Matthew 17:1
  Matthew 19:16
  Matthew 20:29
  Matthew 27:6,7
  Matthew 27:37
  Matthew 28:7
  Mark 2:26
  Mark 16:7,8
  John 2:13-16
  James 1:13

Science
Miracles
Evolution
Creation
Carbon Dating

Common
Trinity
Soul
Heaven
Hell
Satan/Demons
"Saved"
Baptism
Resurrection
Antichrist

Unique
Catholic
Mormon
SDA
JW
British Israel
Church
of Christ
Pentecostal
Islam

The Cleansing of the Temple

John 2:13-16
" . . . Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an house of merchandise."

Matthew 21:12,13
" . . . My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves."

Problem:
Since John places the cleansing of the temple at the beginning of Christ's ministry, and Matthew, and the other Gospels, place it at the end of his ministry, it is argued that the compilations of the Gospels could not have been divine.

Solution:
  1. It is true that John places the cleansing at the beginning of Christ's ministry and the other Gospels place it just prior to the crucifixion. The reason for this is that there were two, and not just one, cleansing of the temple.

  2. A comparison of the contexts of these two passages indicates the contrast in events preceding and following the temple cleansings. In John's Gospel the cleansing occurs at the beginning of Christ's miracles at Cana of Galilee. (John 2:11). Jesus journeyed from Capernaum to Jerusalem in this Gospel. The cleansing is then followed by the Jews' request for a sign. In Matthew's Gospel, Jesus comes to Jerusalem from Judea beyond Jordan (Matthew 19:1), and enters Jerusalem on an ass to the cries of "Hosanna" from the populace. (Matthew 21:9). The cleansing of the temple is then followed by the cursing of the fig tree. (Matthew 21:18, 19). It follows, therefore, that two different cleansings occurred.

  3. It is appropriate that the cleansing of the temple at the end of Christ's ministry should prohibit the carrying of vessels in the temple: "And {he} would not suffer that any man should carry any vessel through the temple." (Mark 11:16). The outer court of the temple was called "The Court of the Gentiles." It was a large open area, the only area of the temple to which the Gentiles had access. But this area had become a shortcut route for persons traveling to and from the north end of the city. The prohibition of Jesus was in effect a symbolic declaration that the outer court was also holy, and that the Gentile as well as the Jew was now acceptable before God. There was to be "neither Jew nor Greek, neither bond nor free" - all the baptized were to be "one in Christ Jesus". (Gal. 3:28).